Arquitectura de horizontes en emprendimiento social: innovación con tecnologías emergentes

Maria Soledad Ramirez-Montoya; José-Guadalupe González-Padrón

doi:10.35699/1983-3652.2022.25716

Authors

Maria Soledad Ramirez-Montoya Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Humanities and Education, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1274-706X
José-Guadalupe González-Padrón Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Humanities and Education, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7942-744X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2022.25716

Keywords:

Instructional design, Educational innovation, Social entrepreneurship, Emerging technologies, Higher education

Abstract

Social entrepreneurship is an important area for training in higher education, where the linkage with different sectors is strategic to create sustainability options for citizens. The objective of this article is to analyze the perception of the level of mastery of social skills by graduate students, with an innovative design course that integrated the method of Architecture of Horizons, as well as emerging technologies (virtual reality, augmented, open resources and interactive videos) for the construction of entrepreneurship projects that contribute to the objectives of sustainable development. The study method was mixed, with concurrent triangulation, where Likert scales of social entrepreneurship and innovation were applied, as well as focus group, to a population of 65 students, in a distance learning course. The results show the perception of disruptive educational innovation in the design of the course and the development of social entrepreneurship competence, mainly in the sub-competencies of social value, leadership and personal. This article may be of value to students, teachers, researchers, and decision makers interested in educational innovation and entrepreneurship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BARROSO, E.; MOLINA, E. y POIRÉ, P. A new framework for navigating the complexities of accelerated technological change and Internet impact on small-medium size business growth in Mexico. México: Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Gobierno y Transformación Social, 2019.

BROWN, Abbie y GREEN, Timothy D. The essentials of instructional design: connecting fundamental principles with process and practice. Third edition. New York: Routledge, 2016.

CÓZAR-GUTIÉRREZ, Ramón y SÁEZ-LÓPEZ, José Manuel. Game-based learning and gamification in initial teacher training in the social sciences: an experiment with MinecraftEdu. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, v. 13, n. 1, pág. 2, dic. 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-016-0003-4. Disponible en: http://www.educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/content/13/1/2. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

CRESWELL, John W. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2007.

DOMÍNGUEZ PÉREZ, Claudia; ORGANISTA SANDOVAL, Javier y LÓPEZ ORNELAS, Maricela. Instructional design for the development of digital educational contents for smartphones. Apertura, v. 10, n. 2, p. 80-93, oct. 2018. DOI: 10.32870/Ap.v10n2.1346. Disponible en: http://www.udgvirtual.udg.mx/apertura/index.php/apertura/article/view/1346. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

DRACHSLER, H. y KALZ, M. The MOOC and learning analytics innovation cycle (MOLAC): a reflective summary of ongoing research and its challenges: MOLAC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, v. 32, n. 3, p. 281-290, jun. 2016. DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12135. Disponible en: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/jcal.12135. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

FIDALGO-BLANCO, Angel y col. Micro flip teaching – An innovative model to promote the active involvement of students. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 72, p. 713-723, jul. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.060. Disponible en: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0747563216305507. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

FILSER, Matthias y col. Entrepreneurship as Catalyst for Sustainable Development: Opening the Black Box. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 16, pág. 4503, ago. 2019. DOI: 10.3390/su11164503. Disponible en: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4503. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

GARCÍA-GONZÁLEZ, Abel y RAMÍREZ-MONTOYA, María Soledad. An instrument for evaluating the innovation of an educational platform: Reliability piloting. In: PROCEEDINGS of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality. León Spain: ACM, oct. 2019. p. 711-717. DOI: 10.1145/3362789.3362793. Disponible en: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3362789.3362793. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

GARCÍA-GONZÁLEZ, Abel; ROMERO-RODRIGUEZ, Luis-Miguel y col. Validation of instruments to measure social entrepreneurship competence. The OpenSocialLab project. In: 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). Porto, Portugal: IEEE, abr. 2020. p. 1338-1342. DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125382. Disponible en: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9125382/. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

HARRIS, Alma y DEFLAMINIS, John. Distributed leadership in practice: Evidence, misconceptions and possibilities. Management in Education, v. 30, n. 4, p. 141-146, oct. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/0892020616656734. Disponible en: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0892020616656734. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

HERNANDEZ-DE-MENENDEZ, Marcela; ESCOBAR DÍAZ, Carlos A. y MORALES-MENENDEZ, Ruben. Educational experiences with Generation Z. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), v. 14, n. 3, p. 847-859, sep. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s12008-020-00674-9. Disponible en: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12008-020-00674-9. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

HIDROGO, Irving y col. Mostla for engineering education: part 2 emerging technologies. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), v. 14, n. 4, p. 1461-1473, dic. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s12008-020-00729-x. Disponible en: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12008-020-00729-x. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

KOLLECK, Nina. Uncovering influence through Social Network Analysis: the role of schools in Education for Sustainable Development. Journal of Education Policy, v. 31, n. 3, p. 308-329, mayo 2016. DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2015.1119315. Disponible en: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02680939.2015.1119315. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

KUMAR, Amit; MANTRI, Archana y DUTTA, Rubina. Development of an augmented reality‐based scaffold to improve the learning experience of engineering students in embedded system course. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, v. 29, n. 1, p. 244-257, ene. 2021. DOI: 10.1002/cae.22245. Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.22245. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

LEECH, Nancy L. y ONWUEGBUZIE, Anthony J. An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, v. 22, n. 4, p. 557-584, dic. 2007. DOI: 10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557. Disponible en: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

MARTIN, Florence; DENNEN, Vanessa P. y BONK, Curtis J. A synthesis of systematic review research on emerging learning environments and technologies. Educational Technology Research and Development, v. 68, n. 4, p. 1613-1633, ago. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-020-09812-2. Disponible en: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11423-020-09812-2. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

MELETIOU-MAVROTHERIS, Maria; MAVROU, Katerina y REBELO, Piedade Vaz. The Role of Learning and Communication Technologies in Online Courses’ Design and Delivery: A Cross-National Study of Faculty Perceptions and Practices. Frontiers in Education, v. 6, pág. 558676, mar. 2021. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2021.558676. Disponible en: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.558676/full. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

MIRANDA, Jhonattan y col. Open Innovation Laboratories as Enabling Resources to Reach the Vision of Education 4.0. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC). Valbonne Sophia-Antipolis, France: IEEE, jun. 2019. p. 1-7. DOI: 10.1109/ICE.2019.8792595. Disponible en: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8792595/. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

MORA, Nohemí y RAMOS, Luis. Red social facebook y el diseño instruccional ASSURE. Impacto Científico, v. 12, n. 1, p. 189-199, 2017. Disponible en: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Red-social-facebook-y-el-dise%5C%C3%5C%B1o-instruccional-Mora-Ramos/b4b0fa4c6a06a1c66a9f60672e4d7c24237ac27d. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

ONWUEGBUZIE, Anthony y LEECH, Nancy. Linking Research Questions to Mixed Methods Data Analysis Procedures 1. The Qualitative Report, 2006. ISSN 2160-3715, 1052-0147. DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2006.1663. Disponible en: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol11/iss3/3/. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

ORÚS, Carlos y col. The effects of learner-generated videos for YouTube on learning outcomes and satisfaction. Computers & Education, v. 95, p. 254-269, abr. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.007. Disponible en: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360131516300070. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

ÖZGEN, Dilay Seda; AFACAN, Yasemin y SÜRER, Elif. Usability of virtual reality for basic design education: a comparative study with paper-based design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, v. 31, n. 2, p. 357-377, abr. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s10798-019-09554-0. Disponible en: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10798-019-09554-0. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

PORTUGUEZ CASTRO, May; ROSS SCHEEDE, Carlos y GÓMEZ ZERMEÑO, Marcela Georgina. The Impact of Higher Education on Entrepreneurship and the Innovation Ecosystem: A Case Study in Mexico. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 20, pág. 5597, oct. 2019. DOI: 10.3390/su11205597. Disponible en: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/20/5597. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

PORTUGUEZ-CASTRO, May y GÓMEZ-ZERMEÑO, Marcela Georgina. Analysis of the Opinion of Teachers on Students Participation in Entrepreneurship Activities in Higher Education. In: 2ND International Conference on Research Approaches in Social Science, Business E- Commerce and Entrepreneurship. Taipei, Taiwan: Taiwan Academy of Social Sciences, 2020. Disponible en: https://escueladehumanidades.tec.mx/dee/content/analysis-opinion-teachers-students-participation-entrepreneurship-activities-higher. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

QUINN, Sarah y OWEN, Susanne. Digging deeper: Understanding the power of ‘student voice’. Australian Journal of Education, v. 60, n. 1, p. 60-72, abr. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/0004944115626402. Disponible en: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0004944115626402. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

RAMIREZ-MONTOYA, Maria-Soledad y col. Emerging technologies for the proposal and design of a MOOC on social entrepreneurship. In: 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). Porto, Portugal: IEEE, abr. 2020. p. 1343-1346. DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125194. Disponible en: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9125194/. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

ROMÁN-GONZÁLEZ, Marcos; PÉREZ-GONZÁLEZ, Juan-Carlos y JIMÉNEZ-FERNÁNDEZ, Carmen. Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 72, p. 678-691, jul. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047. Disponible en: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0747563216306185. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

ROSE, Emily y col. The Flipped Classroom in Emergency Medicine Using Online Videos with Interpolated Questions. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, v. 51, n. 3, 284-291.e1, sep. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.05.033. Disponible en: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0736467916301639. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

SÁNCHEZ-HERNÁNDEZ y MALDONADO-BRIEGAS. Sustainable Entrepreneurial Culture Programs Promoting Social Responsibility: A European Regional Experience. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 13, pág. 3625, jul. 2019. DOI: 10.3390/su11133625. Disponible en: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3625. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

SCHNEIDER, Michael y PRECKEL, Franzis. Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, v. 143, n. 6, p. 565-600, 2017. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000098. Disponible en: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/bul0000098. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

SMITH, Louis M. Ethics, field studies, and the paradigm crisis. In: THE paradigm dialog. Egon G. Guba. Newbury Park, California, Estados Unidos: Sage, 1990. p. 139-157.

TRAXLER, John. Ethics and ICTD Research. In: CHIB, Arul y HARRIS, Roger W. (Ed.). Linking Research to Practice. Strengthening ICT for Development Research Capacity in Asia. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing, dic. 2012. p. 68-81. DOI: 10.1355/9789814380010-012. Disponible en: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1355/9789814380010-012/html. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

ULRICH, Frank y col. Learning effectiveness of 360° video: experiences from a controlled experiment in healthcare education. Interactive Learning Environments, v. 29, n. 1, p. 98-111, ene. 2021. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1579234. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10494820.2019.1579234. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

UNESCO. La UNESCO y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible, sep. 2015. Disponible en: https://es.unesco.org/sdgs. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

UTOMO, Hardi y col. Developing social entrepreneurship: a study of community perception in Indonesia. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, v. 7, n. 1, p. 233-246, sep. 2019. DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2019.7.1(18). Disponible en: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/366. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.