Ensino de línguas em Blended e Tandem com parceiros brasileiros: modelos de ensino flexíveis

Ulisses Tadeu Vaz de Oliveira

doi:10.17851/1983-3652.10.2.123-144

Autores

Ulisses Tadeu Vaz de Oliveira Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17851/1983-3652.10.2.123-144

Palavras-chave:

Computer-Assisted Language Learning, blended learning, tandem learning, Systemic-Functional Linguistics, ICT

Resumo

ABSTRACT: This case study aims at arriving at a thorough understanding of the complexities at issue for the implementation and development of the in-curriculum discipline of English in the School of Business and Hospitality in a Brazilian university targeting internationalization. On top of that, the program has a technological approach, which is, in other words, the use of technology (specifically ICT) as pivotal to maximize learning opportunities through a flexible delivery of instructions. The program was primarily designed by the approach of blended learning, but this case study also describes a merge with tandem learning in which it was a pilot project. I initially present theories that have framed this research. Next, I share my experience teaching and coordinating the program, and then I make some considerations about positive aspects and upcoming challenges
KEYWORDS: Computer-Assisted Language Learning; blended learning; tandem learning; Systemic-Functional Linguistics; ICT.

RESUMO: O presente estudo de caso tem como objetivo chegar a uma extensa compreensão das complexidades em questão para a implementação e o desenvolvimento da disciplina curricular de Inglês na Escola de Negócios e Hospitalidade de uma universidade brasileira, visando a sua internacionalização. Além disso, o programa tem uma abordagem tecnológica, ou seja, o uso da tecnologia (especificamente TIC) como elemento crucial para maximizar oportunidades de aprendizagem através de um modelo flexível de ensino. O programa foi principalmente desenvolvido com enfoque na abordagem do blended learning. No entanto, este estudo de caso também descreve uma mesclagem com o tandem learning num projeto piloto. Inicialmente, são apresentadas as teorias que enquadram a pesquisa; em seguida, compartilhamos nossa experiência de ensino e coordenação do programa para, então, fazer algumas considerações sobre aspectos positivos e desafios futuros.
PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Aprendizagem mediada pelo computador; blended learning; tandem learning; Linguística Sistêmico-Funcional; TIC.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Ulisses Tadeu Vaz de Oliveira, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul

Ph.D. in Applied Linguistics and Language Studies from the PUC-São Paulo and M.A. degree in the same area and university. Work as Associate Professor at Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS) teaching subjects on the scope of Linguistics and English for undergraduate and postgraduate students. Previously, worked as Assistant Professor at Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados (UFGD), and was English lecturer and the Coordinator of LEP (Laureate English Program) of Laureate International Universities in the School of Business & Hospitality at the University Anhembi Morumbi. During that time, taught English to Marketing, Business Administration, International Trade, Hospitality and International Relations majors. Ongoing research deals with: (I) Tandem learning, focusing on ICT in education for In-curriculum disciplines and Content & Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) for undergraduate students; (II) ideology and persuasion within the theoretical framework of the Systemic-Functional Linguistics; and (III) Portuguese Philology and diachronic studies involving medieval Galaic-Portuguese chants with a special regard to language and historical studies of both Iberian and Brazilian societies.

Referências

ALJAAFREH, A.; Lantolf, J. P. Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), p. 465-483, 1994.

ANTHONY, L. Defining English for specific purposes and the role of the ESP practitioner, 1997. Available in: http://www.laurenceanthony.net/abstracts/Aizukiyo97.pdf. Retrieved: November 2015.

BAPORIKAR, N. 21st Century Higher Education Trends in Sultanate of Oman. Strategic Role of Tertiary Education and Technologies for Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Hershey, PA, 2013, p. 140-155.

BAUMEISTER, R. F.; LEARY, M. R. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological bulletin, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 117(3), p. 497, 1995.

BEATTY, K. Teaching & researching: Computer-assisted language learning. Routledge. New York: Pearson ESL, 2013.

BERSIN, J. The blended learning book: Best practices, proven methodologies, and lessons learned. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.

BONK, C. J., & GRAHAM, C. R. The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.

BOSWOOD, T. New ways of using computers in language teaching. TESOL Series II – Innovative Classroom Techniques. Alexandria, VA: TESOL Publications, 1997.

BRAMMERTS, H. Language learning in tandem using the Internet. Telecollaboration in foreign language learning, Hawaii, Honolulu: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Centre, 1996, p. 121-130.

BRIERLEY, W. Computers as a tool in Language Teaching. Ellis Horwood Series on Computers and Their Applications. New York: Ellis Horwood, 1991.

BRUNER, J. Child's talk: Learning to use language. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, London: Sage, 1(1), p. 111-114., 1985.

CLEVELAND-INNES, M. F., & GARRISON, D. R. (Eds.). An Introduction to Distance Education. Understanding teaching and learning in a new era. New York: Routledge. 2010, p. 13-26.

DIAZ, R. M., NEAL, C. J., & AMAYA-WILLIAMS, M. The social origins of self-regulation. In: Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1990, p. 127-154,

DUDENEY, G., & Hockly, N. How to Teach English with Technology. China: Longman, 2007.

DUHANEY, D. C. Blended learning in education, training, and development. Performance Improvement, 43(8), p. 35-38, 2004.

EDIRIPPULIGE, S. et al. Evaluation of E-Learning Practices in Undergraduate Medical Education: Results of a Survey in Sri Lanka. European Conference on eHealth 2007, Proceedings of the ECEH 2007, Gesellschaft für Informatik, 2013, p. 217-224.

EGGINS, S. Introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: A&C Black, 2004.

FAIRCLOUGH, N. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.

FERGUSON, G.; PÉREZ-LLANTADA, C.; PLO, R. English as an international language of scientific publication: a study of attitudes. World Englishes, 30(1), 41-59, 2011.

FOWLER, R. Language in the news: discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge, 1991.

GARRISON, D. R., & KANUKA, H. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The internet and higher education, 7(2), 95-105, 2004.

GAY, G. Culturally responsive teaching: theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press, 2000.

GRAHAM, R. Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends and Future Directions. California: Academia.edu, 2013.

GURI-ROSENBLIT, S.; GROS, B. E-learning: Confusing terminology, research gaps and inherent challenges. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 25(1), s/p., 2011. Available in: http://ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/729/1206. Retrieved: December 2017.

GUTH, S.; THOMAS, M. Telecollaboration with Web 2.0 tools. Telecollaboration, 2, p. 39- 68, 2010.

HAKUTA, K.; BUTLER, Y. G.; WITT, D. How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency?. Policy Report. 2000–1. Santa Barbara: University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute, 2000.

HALLIDAY, M. A. Functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold, 1994.

HALLIDAY, M. A.; MATTHIESSEN, C. M. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3 ed.London: Arnold, 2004.

HANNAFIN, M. J.; LAND, S. M. The foundations and assumptions of technologyenhanced student-centered learning environments. Instructional science, 25(3), p. 167- 202, 1997.

JENKINS, J. The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: University Press, 2000.

JENKINS, J. English as a lingua franca: Interpretations and attitudes. World Englishes, 28(2), p. 200-207, 2009.

KACHRU, B. B. The other tongue: English across cultures. Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1992.

KECSKES, I. Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(3), p. 385-406, 2008.

LARSEN-FREEMAN, D.; ANDERSON, M. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching.UK: Oxford University Press, 2013.

LEE, C. F. K. et al. Web-based teaching and English language teaching: A Hong Kong experience. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 2005.

LEFFA, V. J. Metodologia do ensino de línguas. In: BOHN, H.; ANDRESEN, P. Tópicos em lingüística aplicada: O ensino de línguas estrangeiras. Florianópolis: Ed. da UFSC, 1988, p. 211-236.

MARTIN, J. R. Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 142-175, 2000.

MARTIN, J. R.; WHITE, P. R. The language of evaluation. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.

MASLOW, A. H. A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review. 50(4), 370-96, 1943.

McKAY, S. L. Teaching English as an international language: Rethinking goals and perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.

O’DOWD, R. (Ed.). Online intercultural exchange: An introduction for foreign language teachers. United Kingdom, Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Vol. 15, 2007.

O’REILLY, T. What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & strategies, (1), 17, 2007.

RAMOS, M. Possibilidades e desafios na organização do currículo integrado. In: Ensino médio integrado: concepção e contradições. São Paulo: Cortez, 2005, p. 106-127.

RICHARDS, J. C.; RODGERS, T. S. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. UK: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

RICHARDS, J. C.; RODGERS, T. S. Approaches and methods in language teaching. UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

SCHMID, R. F., et al. The effects of technology use in postsecondary education: A metaanalysis of classroom applications. Computers & Education, 72, p. 271-291, 2014.

SPICER-ESCALANTE, M. L. Revising our Curriculum/Empowering Students: Teachers ‘Preparation and Perceptions about Bilingual Writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, UK: Academy Publisher, 1(11), p. 1453-1458, 2011.

STAKER, H.; HORN, M. B. Classifying K-12 Blended Learning. Mountain View, CA: Innosight Institute. 2012.

TALMY, L. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In: Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Vol. 17, 2012.

THORNE, K. Blended learning: how to integrate online & traditional learning. UK, London: Kogan Page Publishers, 2003.

VYGOTSKY L. S. The genesis of higher mental functions. The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1981, p. 144–188.

WERTSCH, J. W. The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues. New directions for child development. Children's learning in the “zone of proximal development”. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, n. 23, p. 7-18, 1984.

ZIMMERMAN, B. J. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational psychologist, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 25(1), p. 3-17, 1990.