Perceptions of Higher Education Chemistry Teachers on the Use of Molecular Models in Their Professional Paths
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2022u935963Keywords:
Educational Resources, Mediated Action, Molecular Models, Higher EducationAbstract
Mediation is a key concept in sociohistorical psychology, as first proposed by Vygotsky then expanded by Wertsch in his Mediated Action Theory. Using a historical/procedural approach, some properties of mediated action are taken in this article as an organizing principle to analyze reports of six chemistry professors on the implementation of an educational resource known as the molecular model in their professional careers. We focus mainly on processes mediated by molecular models, the changes that have occurred in these processes and the recognition of constraints and affordances related to their use in classes, in light of the Mediated Action Theory. The main results point to transformations in the teachers’ actions, from adaptation, replacement and/or abandonment of molecular models in their teaching practice to changes in their abilities to use them, often motivated by the recognition of constraints/affordances that had been observed in the classroom. Finally, we extend these contributions and implications to the field of Science Education.
Downloads
References
Alves, E. G., & Mortimer, E. F. (03–06 de Julho, 2017). Integração de diferentes modos semióticos em textos multimodais de livros didáticos de Física: considerações sobre o caminho de leitura. XI Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências (ENPEC), Florianópolis, Santa Catarina.
Alves, E. G., & Mortimer, E. F. (25–28 de Junho, 2019). Utilizando o eye-tracking para caracterizar a leitura de textos multimodais de livros de física. XII Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências (ENPEC), Natal, Rio Grande do Norte.
Arendt, H. (1977). The life of the mind, Vol 1: Thinking. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Azevedo, L. L., Martins, P. C., Mortimer, E. F., Quadros, A. L., Sá, E. F., Moro, L., & Pereira, R. R. (2014). Recursos de expressividade usados por uma professora universitária. Distúrbios da Comunicação, 26(4), 777–789. https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/dic/article/view/19245
Bruner, J. (1973). Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing. W. W. Norton.
Buty, C., & Mortimer, E. F. (2008). Dialogic/authoritative discourse and modelling in a high school teaching sequence on optics. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (12), 1635–1660. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701466280
Cunha, M. I. (1997). Conta-me agora!: as narrativas como alternativas pedagógicas na pesquisa e no ensino. Revista da Faculdade de Educação, 23(1–2), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-25551997000100010
Cunha, M. I. (2009). O bom professor e sua prática (21ª ed.). Papirus.
Darsie, M. M. P., & Carvalho, A. M. P. (1996). O início da formação do professor reflexivo. Revista da Faculdade de Educação, 22(2), 90–108. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-25551996000200005
Evagorou, M., Erduran, S., & Mäntylä, T. (2015). The Role of Visual Representations in Scientific Practices: From Conceptual Understanding and Knowledge Generation to ‘Seeing’how Science Works. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0024-x
Facci, M. G. D. (2004). Valorização ou esvaziamento do trabalho do professor? Um estudo crítico-comparativo da teoria do professor reflexivo, do construtivismo e da psicologia vigotskiana. Campinas: Autores Associados.
Fernandes, A. T. C. (2004). Livros didáticos em dimensões materiais e simbólicas. Educação e Pesquisa, 30(3), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-97022004000300011
Gauvain, M. (2001). Cultural tools, social interaction, and the development of thinking. Human Development, 44(2–3), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1159/000057052
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Front Cover: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Habraken, C. L. (1996). Perceptions of chemistry: Why is the common perception of chemistry, the most visual of sciences, so distorted. Journal of Science Education and Technology, (5), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01575303
Hodson, D. (1992). In search of a meaningful relationship: an exploration of some issues relating to integration in science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 14(5), 541–562. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0950069920140506
Ingold, T. (2008). Tres en uno: Como disolver las distinciones entre cuerpo, mente e cultura. In T. S. Criado, Tecnogénesis: la construcción técnica de las ecologias humanas (pp. 1–33). AIBR.
Jewitt, C. (2009). The routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. Routledge.
Jewitt, C. E. (2011). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. Routledge.
Knuuttila, T. (2005). Models as epistemic artefacts: Toward a non-representationalist account of scientific representation. University of Helsinki.
Kozma, R. B., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry instruction. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 105–143. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0902_1
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Macdonald, C. A. (2006). The properties of mediated action in three different literacy contexts in South Africa. Theory & Psychology, 16(1), 51–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354306060109
Martins, C. B. (2012). Sociologia e Ensino Superior: Encontro ou Desencontro. Dossiê Sociedade e Educação: dilemas contemporâneos. Sociologias, (29), 100–127.
Maton, K. (2013). Making semantic waves: a key to cumulative knowledge-building. Linguistics and Education, 24(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.005
Maton, K., & Chen, R. T. H. (2017). Specialization from Legitimation Code Theory: How the basis of achievement shapes student success. In J. R. Martin, K. Maton, W. Pin & W. Zhenhua (Eds), Understanding Academic Discourse. Higher Education Press.
McNeill, D., & Levy, E. (1982). Conceptual representations in language activity and gesture. In R. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics (pp. 271–295). Wiley.
Moro, L., Mortimer, E. F., Quadros, A. L., Coutinho, F. A., Silva, P. S., Pereira, R. R., & Santos, V. C. (2015a). Influência de um terceiro modo semiótico na gesticulação de uma professora de Química. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 15(1), 9–32.
Morrison, M., & Morgan, M. S. (1999). Models as Mediating Instruments. In M. S. Morgan & M. Morrison (Eds.), Models as mediators (pp. 10–37). Cambridge University Press.
Mortimer, E. F., & Quadros, A. L. (Eds.) (2018). Multimodalidade no Ensino Superior. UNIJUÍ.
Neves, C. E. B., Sampaio, H., & Heringer, R. (2018). A institucionalização da pesquisa sobre ensino superior no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Sociologia, 6(12), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.20336/rbs.243
Oliveira, L. A. (2018). Interações de Professores de Química do Ensino Superior com Meios Mediacionais em Salas de Aula: História, Limites e Possibilidades (Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais). Repositório Institucional da UFMG. http://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUOS-B46JG3
Oliveira, J. R. S., & Queiroz, S. L. (2011). A retórica da linguagem científica em atividades didáticas no ensino superior de Química. Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia, 4(1), 89–115.
Oliveira, L. A. D., & Quadros, A. L. D. (2020). O uso do caso talidomida auxiliando na construção de significados em aulas de Química do Ensino Superior. Química Nova, 43(4), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.21577/0100-4042.20170487
Oliveira, L. A., Sá, E. F., & Mortimer, E. F. (2019). Transformação da Ação Mediada a partir da Ressignificação do Uso de Objetos Mediadores em Aulas do Ensino Superior. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 19(u), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2019u251274
Oliveira, L., & Mortimer, E. F. (2020). Os Percursos de Transformação da Ação Mediada Por Recursos Educacionais: O Ponto de Vista De Uma Professora de Química Orgânica de Ensino Superior. Ensaio Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências (Belo Horizonte), 22(u), e19940. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-21172020210134
Pereira, R. R., Mortimer, E. F., & Moro, L. (2015b). Os Gestos Recorrentes e a Multimodalidade em Aulas de Química Orgânica no Ensino Superior. Química Nova na Escola, 37(esp.), 43–54. http://qnesc.sbq.org.br/online/qnesc37_especial_I/08-CP-107-14.pdf
Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2012). Learning through constructing representations in science: A framework of representational construction affordances. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 2751-2773. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.626462
Quadros, A. L. D., & Mortimer, E. F. (2014). Fatores que tornam o professor de Ensino Superior bem-sucedido: analisando um caso. Ciência & Educação (Bauru), 20(1), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-731320140010016
Quadros, A. L. D., & Mortimer, E. F. (2016). A Atuação de Professores de Ensino Superior: Investigando Dois Professores Bem Avaliados pelos Estudantes. Química Nova, 39(5), 634–640. https://doi.org/10.5935/0100-4042.20160037
Quadros, A. L. D., Silva, A. S. F., & Mortimer, E. F. (2018b). Relações pedagógicas em aulas de ciências da Educação Superior. Química Nova, 41(2), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.21577/0100-4042.20170178
Quadros, A. L., Martins, R. F., Silva, A. S. F., & Mortimer, E. F. (2018a). As relações pedagógicas no Ensino Superior: análise a partir de uma amostra de professores. In E. F. Mortimer, & A. L. Quadros (Eds.), Multimodalidade no Ensino Superior (pp.117–140). UNIJUÍ.
Rogoff, B., Baker-Sennett, J., & Matusov, E. (1993). Considering the concept of planning. In M. Haith, J. Benson, B. Pennington, & R. Roberts (Eds.), Future-Oriented Processes. University of Chicago Press.
Schütze, F. (1983). Biographical research and narrative interview. Neue Praxis, 13(3), 283–293. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-53147
Silva, B. R., Silva, S. L. D., & Leite, B. S. (2021). Sala de Aula Invertida no Ensino da Química Orgânica: Um Estudo de Caso. Química Nova, 44(4), 493–501. https://doi.org/10.21577/0100-4042.20170677
Silva, J. G. (2012). A significação de representações químicas e a filosofia de Wittgenstein (Tese de Doutorado, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo). Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP. https://doi.org/10.11606/T.48.2012.tde-29082012-104740
Stieff, M., Scopelitis, S., Lira, M. E., & Desutter, D. (2016). Improving Representational Competence with Concrete Models. Science Education, 100(2), 344–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21203
Stull, A. T., Gainer, M., & Padalkar, S., & Hegarty, M. (2016). Promoting Representational Competence with Molecular Models in Organic Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(6), 994–1001. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00194
Stull, A., Hegarty, M., Dixon, B., & Stieff, M. (2012). Representation Translation with Concrete Models in Organic Chemistry. Cognition and Instruction, 30(4), 404–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2012.719956
Tardif, M., Lessard, C., & Lahaye, L. (1991). Os professores face ao saber: esboço de uma problemática do saber docente. Teoria e Educação, 4, 215–233.
John-Steiner, V. (1991). Cognitive pluralism: A Whorfian analysis. In B. Spolsky, & R. Cooper (Eds.), Festschrift in honor of Joshua Fishman’s 65th birthday (pp. 61–74). Mouton.
John-Steiner, V. (1995). Cognitive pluralism: A sociocultural approach. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039509524680
Vigotski, L. S. (2003). A formação social da mente: o desenvolvimento dos processos psicológicos superiores (6ª ed.). Martins Fontes.
Vigotski, L. S. (2010). A construção do pensamento e da linguagem (3ª ed.). Martins Fontes.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind. Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). A sociocultural approach to socially shared cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. American Psychological Association (pp. 85–100).
Wu, H. K., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88(3), 465–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10126
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Leandro Antonio Oliveira, Eduardo Fleury Mortimer
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors are responsible for the veracity of the information provided and for the content of the papers.
The authors who publish in this journal fully agree with the following terms:
- The authors attest that the work is unpublished, that is, it has not been published in another journal, event notices or equivalent.
- The authors attest that they did not submit the paper to another journal simultaneously.
- The authors retain the copyright and grant to RPBEC the right of first publication, with the work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The authors attest that they own the copyright or the written permission from copyright owners of figures, tables, large texts, etc. that are included in the paper.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, to publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after the publication in order to increase the impact and citation of published work.
In case of identification of plagiarism, inappropriate republishing and simultaneous submissions, the authors authorize the Editorial Board to make public what happened, informing the editors of the journals involved, any plagiarized authors and their institutions of origin.